Thursday, June 21, 2012

Rajab Riwayat – Prophecy Fulfilled in Contemporary Events in Syria: Part Three of Salafi Crescent: The Threat of Wahhabi Revival, The End Times Prophecy of the Sufyani, and the 2012 Countdown to the Return of Imam Mahdi al Hujjah min Al-e Muhammad (sawaws)

The prophecies of the Prophet Muhammad (sawaws) and the Ahlul Bayt, His Purified Progeny (as) regarding the emergence of the Sufyani in Syria have been fulfilled this month of Rajab 1433 (May/June 2012). The following are some riwayat (traditions from the Prophet Muhammad and His Pure Progeny, peace be upon them) relevant to the Sufyani's emergence in the Islamic month of Rajab. It is my belief that the kidnapping of Lebanese Shi’a pilgrims in Syria, the suicide bombing of the shrine of Sayyida Zainab (sa) near Damascus, and a major offensive by Syrian rebels who have rejected Kofi Annan’s peace plan and declared an end to any truce – that all of these are acts of the Sufyani. Whether the Sufyani will turn out to be an individual figure descended by blood from the Bani Umayyah, or whether the Sufyani in hadith is meant to be indicative of a grouping who are philosophically and spiritually descended from the likes of the enemies of Muhammad and the Ahlul Bayt (sawaws), such as Abu Sufyan, his wife Hind the Liver Eater, Mu’awiyah, and Yazid – this remains to be seen. This Rajab has seen the emergence of a new organization, the Syrian Revolutionary (or Revolutionaries) Front (SRF), based in Turkey. Whereas the Syrian National Council and its “Free Syrian Army” had taken pains to maintain a Westernized façade of diversity and tolerance, recently choosing a Kurdish leader instead of someone from the Sunni Arab majority, and being careful to keep their Muslim Brotherhood ties in the background, this new grouping of the SRF is explicitly Salafi/Wahhabi. Here’s an excerpt of a report on the SRF from the 20 June 2012 edition of the Kuwaiti Arab Times Online:

A Syrian opposition group announced Monday that they are creating a new military structure consisting of 12,000 fighters to topple the regime of the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
“We announce today the unification of all fronts in a single centre to bring about the collapse of the oppressing regime,” Khaled al-Okla from the Syrian Revolutionaries Front (SRF) read from a statement at a press conference.
The SRF is active across Syria and has 12,000 men under command, uniting more than 100 “battalions,” according to a video presentation broadcast during the conference.
Asked about the relationship between the SRF and the Free Syrian Army, the main opposition force made up of deserting Syrian army officers, Okla said the two forces had frequent “discussions” and were working in “cooperation.”
The SRF also claims support from some members of the Syrian National Council (SNC), recognised by world leaders as a legitimate representative of the Syrian people.
“We, the SNC, bless the founding of the Syrian Revolutionaries Front and affirm that we will provide full support,” said a member of the SNC executive committee, Ahmad Ramadan.
“We say the fight for the freedom of Syria has begun,” he added.
Haitham al-Maleh, a prominent human rights activist, also said he supported the new structure, in a video message sent to the SRF.
The new military structure has a more integrated structure to combat Damascus than the Free Syrian Army, which offers a wide platform without strong organic links, said Mahmut Osman, another member of the SNC.
“The SNC supports this unification of groups acting on the ground,” he added.



Given that the British Foreign Minister, William Hague, has admitted that al Qaeda is on the ground and actively involved in the Syrian opposition, while at the same time reports have come out indicating British troops and intelligence agents are also in Syria and training opposition fighters, it should be clear that the terrorist element of the Syrian opposition has come to the forefront. As in Iraq, where the British were discovered to be behind al Qaeda-style bombings of Shi’a targets, they have also entered the fray in Syria, though it is unclear how long the love affair between the West and the Sufyani will last. Up until now some elements of the Syrian opposition have been loath to be associated with al Qaeda for fear of a drying up of Western and Israeli funding and weapons, as indicated by this LA Times article from  31 May 2012:

The rebels are hypersensitive to any mention of Al Qaeda in Syria or the suggestion that they could be receiving support from the terrorist network.
"We're going to start fighting with a bottle of whiskey in our hand, just so the world sees we're not Al Qaeda," joked Mohammad Khair Raid, a lanky 22-year-old who defected from the army months ago.

But this new grouping, the SRF, has all the trapping of an al Qaeda affiliate, operating under the auspices of Turkey, who is eager to flex its muscles as a regional player (perhaps hankering for the good old days of the Caliphate which was abolished in 1924 with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire). Responsibility for the kidnapping of Lebanese Shi’a pilgrims passing through Syria on their return from Iran was also claimed by a newly announced formation, the “Syrian Rebels in Aleppo”. Although their release was supposed to have been negotiated through Turkey by the Lebanese government a few days after their capture, it has been almost a month and they have yet to be released, with reports their captors are claiming they have amongst their prisoners a relative of Hezbollah leader Sayyid Hassan Nasrullah, and other Hezbollah members. Whether there is any basis for this claim or not, this is another indication that Hezbollah will be pulled into a sectarian civil war in Syria.

This Rajab has seen a major turning point in the Syrian conflict, namely the Houla Massacre. While Western media were quick to claim the intentional killing of children and other civilians was the responsibility of the Shabiha, pro-Assad Alawite militias, dissident reports from the likes of the Frankfurt Allgemeine Zeitung, not exactly a rag for conspiracy theorists, have claimed that in fact the victims were Alawite Shias as well the family of a Sunni who was considered a collaborator by the Syrian rebels for participating in the Syrian parliament, and that the attacks were a false flag operation carried out by Syrian rebels who wanted to draw international powers into the conflict. We cannot say with certainty which account is correct, but BBC use of fake photos in their coverage of the massacre doesn’t add to our confidence in the mainstream media account. The Houla massacre became a casus belli for international militarization of the Syrian conflict, and whereas prior to it some had claimed the conflict would just drag on with Assad remaining in power, the discourse surrounding Syria has changed, and most analysts have recognized that changes are now happening at a rapid pace, perhaps as a result of Western “assistance”, aka weaponization of the conflict. Again, if we ask the question cui bono, who benefits, the massacre seems more likely to be a result of the calculated planning of the Sufyani, rather than the Syrian government, who as in the case of the Rafiq Hariri bombing, have suffered from the fallout of indignation unreflectively pointed at it.

http://truth-out.org/news/item/9875-houla-massacre-carried-out-by-free-syrian-army-according-to-frankfurter-allgemeine-zeitung

As I write this, Press TV and RT (previously known as Russia Today) report that in Homs, rebels have threatened to kill civilians if the army does not withdraw from the city. The civilian population has effectively been taken hostage, used as human shields, in some cases even having been reported to be forced by rebels to demonstrate against Assad. Notably Homs, which is mentioned in riwayat concerning Sufyani, is in a region of northwestern Syria whose majority is from the tribe Bani Kalb. It is the Banu Kalb from which the Sufyani initially draws most of his army.

The latest news from the New York Times of 21 June 2012 confirms that the CIA are also on the ground in Turkey, assisting the Syrian opposition with logistics and heavy weaponry “being funneled mostly across the Turkish border by way of a shadowy network of intermediaries including Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood and paid for by Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar”. A noteworthy passage from the article indicates that a significant faction (or factions) of the opposition in Homs, the home of the Bani Kalb, are not as cooperative with the West as they would like:

About 10 military coordinating councils in provinces across the country are now sharing tactics and other information. The city of Homs is the notable exception. It lacks such a council because the three main military groups in the city do not get along, national council officials said.


Please note that riwayat regarding extraordinary phenomena such as heavy rains and the raising of the dead in the month of Rajab have not been included, because the context of these riwayat indicate that they take place in a month of Rajab after Imam Mahdi (atfs) has already risen out of Ghaibat al-Kubra (major occultation). (See the last tradition I’ve included from Bihar al Anwar.)


Bihar Al Anwar Volumes  51 52 & 53 The Promised Mahdi - English Translation Part 2 – p 143


130- Ghaibat Nomani: It is narrated from Ibne Uqdah from Muhammad bin
Mufaddal bin Ibrahim from Ibne Faddal from Thalaba from Isa bin Ayyan that Imam
Ja’far Sadiq (a.s.) said:

“The rising of Sufyani is an inevitable matter. He will rise in the month
of Rajab. It will take, since his rising until his end, fifteen months. He will
fight for six months. When he conquers the five districts, he will rule for nine
months; no more no less.”
131- Ghaibat Nomani: It is narrated from Ibne Uqdah from Qasim bin
Muhammad Husain from Ubais bin Hisham from Muhammad bin Bashir from Ahwal
from Ibne Jabla from Isa bin Ayyan from Mualla bin Khunais that he said: I heard
Imam Ja’far Sadiq (a.s.) say:

“Some things are inevitable and others are not. From among the
inevitable things is the rising of Sufyani in Rajab.”

Bihar Al Anwar Volumes  51 52 & 53 The Promised Mahdi - English Translation Part 2 – p 144
135- Ghaibat Nomani: It is narrated from Muhammad bin Hamam from Fazari
from Ibad bin Yaqub from Khallad Saigh that Abu Abdullah Imam Sadiq (a.s.) said:
“The rising of Sufyani is inevitable. He will rise in Rajab.” A man asked:
“O Abu Abdullah, when he rises, what shall we do?” He said: “When he rises,
you are to keep to us (Ahlul Bayt).”

Bihar Al Anwar Volumes  51 52 & 53 The Promised Mahdi - English Translation Part 2 – p 194-195

67- Al-Kafi: It is narrated from Ali from his father from Safwan bin Yahya from
Ais bin Qasim from Imam Ja’far Sadiq (a.s.) that he said:
“Fear the Almighty Allah who has no partner and beware of your selfish
desires. By Allah, if one of you had two souls, it would have fought against
another and experienced what happens after being killed and would have
retained the other soul and acted according to that experience, but you have
only one soul, if you lose it, you will also lose the opportunity of repentance;
therefore you are most eligible to see what you choose for yourself and if one
of us stages an uprising, you should consider what is the aim of your uprising
and do not say: Zaid had staged an uprising, because he was a scholar and he
had a clear conscience. He had not called for his own self; he had only called
you to the obedience of Aale Muhammad (a.s.).

Now the one who is rising from among us[1]; tell me to what is he calling?
Is he calling to the obedience of Aale Muhammad (a.s.)? Then know that, we
testify that we are not pleased at this. He is not obeying us. There is no one
with him and no matter with how many flags someone from us may arise, he
is not eligible that he should be obeyed, except one on whom all the
descendants of Fatima have consensus. By Allah, your Sahibul Amr will be
the one on whom all the descendants of Fatima have consensus. Thus when it
is the month of Rajab, you should march out in the name of Allah and if you
want to delay it, there is no harm in delaying it till Shaban and if you want to
keep fasts at home, perhaps in my view, it is better for you and the coming of
Sufyani is a sufficient sign of reappearance for you.”

Bihar Al Anwar Volumes  51 52 & 53 The Promised Mahdi - English Translation Part 2 – p 231
77- Irshad: It is narrated from Abdul Kareem Khathami that he said: I asked
His Eminence, Abu Abdullah Sadiq (a.s.):
“How long would Qaim (a.s.) rule?” He said: He replied: “Seven years,
the days and the nights would be prolonged so much that a year would be as
long as ten years of yours. Thus his rule would be equal to seventy years
according to your standards. And when the time comes for his end in the
month of Jumadi II ten days before Rajab, there would be such heavy rainfall
as the people had not seen before. Then the Almighty Allah by that would
expose the flesh and bodies of the believers in their graves. And as if I could
see them coming from Jehna, shaking off dust from their hair…”


Kamaaluddin wa Tamaamun Ni’ma by Shaykh Saduq 


Kamaaluddin wa Tamaamun Ni’ma  p 286

Chapter Fifty-seven

Signs of the reappearance of al-Qaim (a.s.)

1 - Narrated to us my father: Narrated to us Abdullah bin Ja’far Himyari from Ibrahim
bin Mahziyar from his brother Ali from Husain bin Saeed from Safwan bin Yahya from
Muhammad bin Hakam from Maimoon Alban from Abi Abdullah as-Sadiq (a.s.):
“Five signs will become manifest before the reappearance of the Qaim:
Advent of Yamani and Sufyani, call from the sky, the sinking of Baida land and
the killing of the Pure Soul (Nafse Zakiyyah).”

2 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Hasan bin Ahmad bin Walid (r.a.): Narrated to us
Muhammad bin Hasan Saffar from Abbas bin Maroof from Ali bin Mahziyar from Abdullah
bin Muhammad Hajjal from Thalaba bin Maimoon from Shuaib Hadhdha from Salih, freed
slave of Bani Azra that he said: I heard Abi Abdullah as-Sadiq (a.s.) say:
“There will be only a gap of fifteen days between the rising of the Qaim of
Aale Muhammad and the killing of the Pure Soul (Nafse Zakiyyah).”

Kamaaluddin wa Tamaamun Ni’ma p 287

4 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Hasan bin Ahmad bin Walid (r.a.) that he said:
Narrated to us Husain bin Hasan Ibne Aban from Husain bin Saeed from Nadhr bin Suwaid
from Yahya Halabi from Harith bin Mughaira Basri from Maimoon Alban that he said:
“I was with Imam Muhammad Baqir (a.s.) in his tent. He lifted the opening
of the tent and said: ‘Our Wilayat is clearer than this sun.’ Then he said: ‘A caller
will call out from the sky that so and so son of so and so is Imam. And he would
call out his name. While Iblees, may Allah curse him, would call out from the
earth, in the same way as he had called the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.s.) on the night of
Uqbah.’”

5 - And through the same chain of narrators from Husain bin Saeed from Safwan bin
Yahya from Isa bin Ayyan from Mualla bin Khunais from Abi Abdullah (a.s.) that he said:
“Indeed the advent of Sufyani is a certain matter and it shall take place in the
month of Rajab.”

6 - And through the same chain of narrators from Husain bin Saeed from Hammad bin
Isa from Ibrahim bin Umar from Abi Ayyub from Harith bin Mughaira from Abi Abdullah
(a.s.) that he said:
“The call from the sky shall be raised on the 23rd night of the month of Ramadhan.”

7 - And through the same chain of narrators from Husain bin Saeed from Muhammad
bin Abi Umair from Umar bin Hanzala that he said: I heard Abi Abdullah (a.s.) say:
“Five signs will become manifest before the reappearance of the Qaim:
Advent of Yamani and Sufyani, call from the sky, the killing of the Pure Soul
(Nafse Zakiyyah) and the sinking of Baida land.”

8 - Narrated to us my father: Narrated to us Saad bin Abdullah: Narrated to us
Muhammad bin Husain bin Abil Khattab from Ja’far bin Basheer from Hisham bin Saalim
from Zurarah from Abi Abdullah (a.s.) that he said:
“A caller will call out in the name of the Qaim.” I asked: “Will it be for
some people or for all?” He replied: “It would be for all. And every community
will hear it in its own language.” I asked: “Would the opponents of Qaim be also
called in his name?” “No,” he said, “For them Iblees will call out at the end of the
night and put suspicion in the hearts of the people.”

Kamaaluddin wa Tamaamun Ni’ma p 288
   
9 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Ali Majilaway (r.a.) that he said: Narrated to us my
uncle Muhammad bin Abil Qasim from Muhammad bin Ali Kufi from Muhammad bin Abi
Umair from Umar bin Uzaina that he said: Abi Abdullah (a.s.) said to me: Amirul Momineen
(a.s.) said:
“The son of the liver-eater will come out from the valley of Yabis. He shall
be of medium height. His face will be horrible. He will be fat. His face will be
pockmarked. He will be one-eyed. His name will be Uthman and his father’s
name will be Anbasa. He will be from the progeny of Abu Sufyan. He will camp
in Kufa where he will sit on the pulpit.”

10 - Narrated to us Ahmad bin Ziyad bin Ja’far Hamadani: Narrated to us Ali bin
Ibrahim bin Hashim from his father Ibrahim bin Hashim from Muhammad bin Abi Umair
from Hammad bin Uthman from Umar Ibne Yazid that he said: Abi Abdullah as-Sadiq (a.s.)
said to me:
“If you have seen Sufyani you have seen the most horrible man. He is red,
blond and blue. He will say: My Lord, I will take revenge even if I have to go to
Hell. The extent of his evil is that he would bury alive his slave mother so that
she may not reveal his true ancestry.”

11 - Narrated to us my father and Muhammad bin Hasan - May Allah be pleased with
them – they said: Narrated to us Muhammad bin Abil Qasim Majilaway from Muhammad bin
Ali Kufi: Narrated to us Husain bin Sufyan from Qutaibah Ibne Muhammad from Abdullah
bin Abi Mansur Bajali that he said: I asked Abi Abdullah (a.s.) about the name of Sufyani. He
replied:
“Why do you want to know his name? When he conquers the districts of
Shaam, Hams, Palestine, Jordan and Qanassireen, you wait for the reappearance.”
I asked: “Would he rule for nine months?” He replied: “No, only for eight
months and not a day more.”

12 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Ibrahim  bin Ishaq Taliqani (r.a.): Narrated to us
Ahmad bin Ali Ansari from Abi Salt Harawi that he said: I asked ar-Reza (a.s.): 
“What would be the sign of your Qaim when he reappears?” He replied: “He
will be advanced in age but he will seem like a young man. Whoever sees him
will say that he is forty or less. The rotation of days and nights does not affect
him till his last.”

13 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Ali Majilaway (r.a.) from his uncle Muhammad bin
Abil Qasim from Muhammad bin Ali Kufi from his father from Abi Maghra from Mualla bin
Khunais from Abi Abdullah (a.s.) that he said:

Kamaaluddin wa Tamaamun Ni’ma p 289
    
“The call of Jibraeel will come from the sky and the voice of Iblees will
come from the earth. So you must obey the first call and do not pay attention to
the second since it would be to spread mischief.”

14 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Musa bin Mutawakkil: Narrated to us Abdullah bin
Ja’far Himyari from Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Isa from Hasan bin Mahboob from Abu
Hamza Thumali that he said: I asked His Eminence, Abu Abdillah Sadiq (a.s.): Abu Ja’far
(Imam Baqir a.s.) says: The advent of Sufyani is inevitable. He replied:
“Yes, and the conflict of Bani Abbas, the killing of the Pure Soul (Nafs-eZakiyya), the advent of Qaim (a.s.) are among the inevitable occurrences. I
asked: How would the call be? He said: On the first day the caller will call out
from the sky: Indeed, the truth is with Ali and his Shias. After that Iblees, may
Allah curse him, will call at the end of  the day that: Indeed, the truth is with
Sufyani and his followers. Thus at that time those who are inclined to falsehood
will fall into doubt.”

15 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Hasan (r.a.): Narrated to us Husain bin Hasan bin
Aban from Husain bin Saeed from Safwan bin Yahya from Isa bin Ayyan from Mualla bin
Khunais from Abi Abdullah (a.s.) that he said:
“Indeed the advent of Sufyani is inevitable and it shall take place in the
month of Rajab.”

16 - And through the same chain of narrators from Husain bin Saeed from Hammad bin
Isa from Ibrahim bin Umar from Abi Ayyub from Harith bin Mughaira from Abi Abdullah
(a.s.) that he said:
“There will be a call from the sky on Friday eve on the 23rd of the month of
Ramadhan.”

17 - Narrated to us Ali bin Ahmad bin Musa (r.a.): Narrated to us Abi Abdullah Kufi:
Narrated to us Muhammad bin Ismail Barmaki: Narrated to us Ismail bin Malik from
Muhammad bin Sinan from Abil Jarud Ziyad bin Mundhir from Abi Ja’far Muhammad bin
Ali Baqir from his father from his grandfather that he said: Amirul Momineen (a.s.) said from
the pulpit:
“A man from my descendants would appear in the last period of time. His
complexion would be fair with a reddish hue and he would have a broad stomach,
his thighs would be big. And his sides would be broad. He would have two
moles, one skin colored and the other like the seal of prophethood of the Holy
Prophet (s.a.w.s.). He would have two names, one is confidential and the other,
popular. His secret name is Ahmad and his known name is Muhammad. When he
hoists and waves his flag he would illuminate the east and the west. He would
stroke the heads of the people. Thus there would not remain any believer but that
his heart would become as a strong as a mountain of steel and Allah, the Mighty

Kamaaluddin wa Tamaamun Ni’ma p 290
    
and the High would give each of them the strength of forty men. And no corpse
would remain but that the celebration of his reappearance would reach its grave
as the believers in the grave also would see him in their graves and they would
greet each other upon the reappearance of Qaim (a.s.).”

18 - And from the same chain of narrators from Muhammad bin Sinan from Amr bin
Shimr from Jabir from Abi Ja’far (a.s.) that he said:
“Knowledge of the book of Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, and the Sunnah
of His Messenger develops in the heart of our Mahdi, just as a plant grows to
perfection. Thus whosoever of you survives till he sees him, when you meet him
you must greet him by the words: “Peace be on you, O folks of the house of
mercy and prophethood and the mine of knowledge and the abode of
messengership.”
In another narration the Imam is saluted as follows: Peace be on you O the
remnant of Allah on His earth.

19 - Narrated to us Husain bin Ahmad bin Idrees (r.a.): Narrated to us my father from
Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Isa from Husain bin Saeed from Ali bin Abi Hamza from Abi
Baseer that he said: Abu Ja’far (a.s.) said:
“The advent of the Qaim shall take place on a Saturday, the day of Ashura;
that is the day of the martyrdom of Imam Husain (a.s.).”

20 - And through the same chain of narrators from Husain bin Saeed from Ibne Abi
Umair from Abi Ayyub from Abi Baseer that he said: A man from Kufa asked Abi Abdullah
(a.s.):
“With how many men would the Qaim arise? It is said that he will appear
with 313 persons, equal to the martyrs of Badr?” The Imam said: “He will not
appear till he has the required number of people and that number is not less than
10000.”

Kamaaluddin wa Tamaamun Ni’ma p 291

22 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Hasan (r.a.): Narrated to us Muhammad bin Yahya
al-Attar from Muhammad bin Husain bin Abil Khattab from Safwan bin Yahya from Mandal
from Bakkar bin Abi Bakr from Abdullah bin Ijlan that he said:
We were discussing the advent of the Qaim in the company of Abi Abdullah
(a.s.) when I asked him: “How would we know about this?” He replied: “When
you get up in the morning, a slip of paper will be found below your head with the
following written on it: Obedience with recognition.”
And it is narrated that the following shall be written on the banner of Imam
Mahdi (a.s.): The Allegiance is for Allah, the Mighty and Sublime.

23 - Narrated to us my father: Narrated to us Ali bin Ibrahim from his father from
Muhammad bin Abi Umair from Amr bin Abil Miqdam from his father from Ubaid bin Karb
that he said: I heard Ali (a.s.) say:
“There is a flag for us; and one who goes ahead of it is a transgressor and
one who lags behind it, is destroyed and one who follows it would achieve the
truth.”

24 - Narrated to us Ali bin Ahmad bin Abdullah bin Ahmad bin Abi Abdullah Barqi that
he said: Narrated to me my father from his grandfather Ahmad bin Abi Abdullah Barqi from
his father Muhammad bin Khalid from Ibrahim bin Uqbah from Zakariya from his father from
Amr bin Abil Miqdam from Abi Ja’far (a.s.) that he said:
“A fool from the Bani Abbas will be murdered secretly. The cause of his
death shall be that he would have married a eunuch who will slay him when he
get an opportunity. This murder will remain unreported for forty days before it
would be discovered. So the police will go out in search of this eunuch but they
will not return before the downfall of their rule.”

25 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Hasan (r.a.): Narrated to us Husain bin Hasan Aban
from Husain bin Saeed from Nadhr bin Suwaid from Yahya Halabi from Hakam Hannat from
Muhammad bin Hammam from Ward from Abi Ja’far (a.s.) that he said:
“Two signs will be seen before the reappearance: there will be a lunar
eclipse for five days and there will be solar eclipse for fifteen days. Such a
phenomenon has not taken place since the arrival of Adam (a.s.) on the earth. At
that time the calculations of the astrologers will fail.”
                                                

Kamaaluddin wa Tamaamun Ni’ma p 292
   
26 - And through the same chain of narrators from Husain bin Saeed from Nadhr bin
Suwaid from Yahya Halabi from Muammar bin Yahya from Abi Khalid Kabuli from Ali bin
Husain (a.s.) that he said:
“The Bani Abbas will establish a city on the banks of the Euphrates. Their
kingdom will last for a year after this.”

27 - And through the same chain of narrators from Husain bin Saeed from Safwan bin
Yahya from Abdur Rahman Ibne Hajjaj from Sulaiman bin Khalid that he said: I heard Abi
Abdullah (a.s.) say:
“The reappearance of the Qaim will be preceded by two types of death: the
red death and the white death. Five out of seven people will perish through this.
The red death is killing by the sword and the white death is plague.”

28 - Narrated to us Muhammad bin Musa bin Mutawakkil: Narrated to us Ali bin Husain
Sadabadi from Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Khalid from his father from Muhammad bin Abi
Umair from Abi Ayyub from Abi Baseer from Abi Abdullah (a.s.) that he said:
“There will be a solar eclipse on the 5th of Ramadhan preceding the
reappearance of the Qaim.”

29 - And through the same chain of narrators from Abi Ayyub from Abi Baseer and
Muhammad bin Muslim that they said: We heard Abi Abdullah (a.s.) say:
“It will not take place till two-third of human population does not perish.”
He was asked: “If two-third perish, who will remain?” He replied: “Are you not
satisfied that one-third will remain?”
Abu Ja’far Muhammad bin Ali Babawahy the author of this book says: I
have mentioned the signs of reappearance of Qaim (a.s.), his biography and
whatever will occur during his time in the book As Sirrul Maktoom Ilal Waqtul
Maaloom. And there is no power and strength except by Allah the High and the Mighty.

Ali Korani, Epoch of the Appearance, p 47


Now we mention a narrative that has quoted about the three groups that disagree and included: forces of
Qys force. Sfyany would defeat them with his arrival. This narrative in Bahar from Imam Sadiq (AS)
has narrated:
"O Sadir!: always stay home, like a spread rug and relax yourself like day and night, then when Sfyany
exit migrate toward us even on your foot. I said: My master is there anything before that ? he said: yes
and with his three fingers pointed his hand toward the Sham and said: in the Sham three (forces) the
Hassany, Amavy, and Qys get together while disagree with each other, suddenly Sfyany exit and kill
them like I've never seen like that before".
This narrative is difficult to accept because it is against many narratives that determine the triple
groups and connect them to Abq, Ashab and Sfyany, also late Kolayny in his book Kafi v. 8 p. 264
narrates this narrative until "even on your foot". And it is possible that the last part added or some
interpretation from some narrators has mixed with the main narrative ... to the end.
Supposing that is true, the Hassani flag should be mixed with Hussein which is the same one as
Khrasanyan and companions of black flags and as we said previously their forces will be with
Moroccan forces in the Sham and Umayyad flag is the same as Ashab and flag of Qys is the same as
Abq flag that many narratives mention his relationship to Egypt. But some narratives indicate that he
starts his movement from Egypt or he is from Egypt and tribe of Qys... As there is a narrative express
that Sfyany would rule over Egypt... and God knows better
Also there is another narratives that says:
"A man from the Bani- Hasham command and kills children of Umayeh in a way that does not leave
them except a few of them and kill the rest, then a man from Bni-Umayeh exit and for every man he
kills two men so that, except women does not remain anyone and at that time Imam Mahdi (AS) would
appear ". (1)
But this narrative does not determine the territory of this Hashami man who is before the Sfyany is
Hejaz or Iraq.. and if narratives, determine that Sham is his territory, it should be before Abqe, because
the narratives believe the Sfyany's uprising against him and Ashab and killing them and narratives
describe both of them enemies of Ahlulbayt and Shiites



[1] Imam Ja’far Sadiq (a.s.) had prohibited Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Hasan Muthanna
from staging an uprising and also prophesied his killing, but the latter didn’t pay heed.

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Syria this month in Prophecy - The evil Sufyani’s Rise – Rajab 1433 – May/June 2012 - Part Two of Salafi Crescent: The Threat of Wahhabi Revival, The End Times Prophecy of the Sufyani, and the 2012 Countdown to the Return of Imam Mahdi al Hujjah min Al-e Muhammad (sawaws)


The end-time phenomena concerning the Sufyani’s rise in Syria have been prophesied by the family of the Prophet Muhammad (sawaws), the Ahlul Bayt (as), and can be chronologically laid out in a timeline, beginning with the Sufyani’s emergence in the Islamic month of Rajab. We can deduce from the current state of crisis in Syria, and other signs indicative of the imminent emergence of Imam Mahdi, al Hujjat al Qa’im bil Haqq (atfs), that this current month of Rajab 1433, which runs from approximately 23 May until 20 June 2012 (which perhaps not coincidentally is the Summer Solstice), will see the emergence of the Sufyani. Riwayat, or traditions, from Bihar al Anwar and other major Shi’a books of hadith (sayings of the Prophet and his Pure Family) indicate that by the month of Rajab, conditions in Syria will have reached the state of civil war, with three factions or banners competing for governance of the nation. One faction will be fighting under a striped banner, which seems to indicate the “Stars and Stripes” of the United States flag. A second faction will be fighting under a yellow banner, which seems to indicate it will be under the guidance or direction of Hezbollah, the resistance movement in Southern Lebanon whose yellow flag bears an image of an AK-47. The third faction is that of the Sufyani, who at some point in Rajab will turn the tide of the Syrian civil war to dominate.  Let us look more closely at these three factions and the interests that they represent.

The United States of America, by all indications, despite a claim to even-handedness and a desire not to fuel the flames of the Syrian crisis with additional violence, is under the table arming and funding the violent opposition to the current Syrian regime under Bashar al Assad. American foreign policy since World War II, often through the use of the CIA, has never been hesitant to spill blood overtly or covertly for immediate and long-term economic gain and protection of “American interests abroad”. Syria is certainly no exception, and despite prevarications by Hillary Clinton and the State Department regarding a desire to see a nonviolent  resolution to the Syrian matter with Assad stepping down as a result of a peaceful opposition’s civil disobedience, such a scenario is a fairy-tale, and regardless of any possible misgivings America might have about arming al Qaeda, again, they are quite willing to do it (Libya being the most recent case in point), even it will mean the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocent Shi’a spilt (or perhaps precisely so, because there is an awareness at the highest levels of US intelligence that the Shi’a continue to remain as the unwavering resistance to American unipolar hegemony worldwide, a true opposition to Satan/Capital’s injustice, as opposed to the controlled opposition of al Qaeda/Salafism/Wahhabism and the like). The official opposition to Assad is supposedly under the governance of the Syrian National Council, which itself is disunited. The SNC in turn runs the “Free Syrian Army”, who are claimed to be former members of Assad’s military who have broken ranks and taken up arms on the side of the opposition. The Free Syrian Army has 22 battalions, with the one engaging the city of Damascus called the Muawiyah bin Abi Sufiyan battalion, named after the dictator who opposed the first three Shi’a Imams and caused the death of thousands of Muslims. Abu Sufyan, the husband of Muawiyah’s mother, Hind, was an opponent of the prophet Muhammad (sawas) from the start. His wife Hind is known as the liver-eater, for having paid an assassin to kill Hamza, the prophet’s beloved uncle, and consequently eating Hamza’s liver on the battlefield. The figure of the Sufyani is named after Abu Sufyan, and is also referred to by the Ahlul Bayt (as) as the son of the liver-eater. It is from this accursed family line, damned by Allah (swt) in the Holy Qur’an as an “accursed tree” (Surah al ‘Isra, 17:60, Surah Ibrahim 14:26), that the Sufyani emerges. It should be noted that the enemies and murderers of Imam Ali, Imam Hassan, and Imam Hussain (as), came from this family line: Abu Sufyan, Muawiyah, Yazid (though technically Muawiyah’s paternity is not known because he was conceived when Hind engaged in the pre-Islamic Jahiliyyah practice of nikah ijtimah, a form of polyandry in which a group of less than ten men would have sex with a woman, and if a child resulted, one of the men was picked to father it). The official, Western backed opposition is thus itself infused with Nasibi (anti-Shi’ah) elements.

Israel and Mossad no doubt would also like to see this formal opposition triumph, because its leadership has indicated that if successful in regime change it would mend ties with Tel Aviv. Given that heretofore Syria has been a haven for and a sponsor of anti-Zionist movements such as Hezbollah, HAMAS, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Zionist entity would see this as a positive turn of events on its border. Israel in the past has created major instability in Syria, supporting the 1976-1982 Muslim Brotherhood-inspired uprising that ended in February 1982 with the Hama massacre, with anywhere from 10-40 thousand participants being killed in the suppression of the rebellion under the presidency of Hafez al-Assad, and the military command of his younger brother, General Rifaat al-Assad. This was not the last time Israel would support an Islamist movement to weaken an opponent – HAMAS itself was initially backed by Israel to foment rivalry with Fatah and division amongst the Palestinian nation. HAMAS, of course, later became a threat to Israel itself, with backing from Syria and Iran. Its headquarters were based in Damascus since the 1990s, and in 2012 they were moved out as a result of the Syrian political crisis. Although HAMAS has received funding from Shi’ah Islamic Republic of Iran and has worked with Shi’ah Hezbollah in Lebanon, their sympathies seem to rest ultimately with Salafist elements partaking in the Syrian rebellion, and their allegiances are with the Arab oligarchs who can provide them with continued funding, resulting in an attempt to move their Politburo office to Qatar this year. Qatar, the American vassal in the Persian Gulf which uses the BBC spinoff Al Jazeera News to create a false, controlled opposition to Zionism/colonialism amongst the Arab masses, has  itself has made no secret of sending a thousand mercenaries to kill Syrian soldiers, mostly from the ranks of Libyan al-Qaeda, fresh off the heels of their victory in the months long NATO and Qatar-backed civil war against Qadhaffi.

Thus the differences between the Western backed opposition and the violent takfiri Salafist rebellion become more blurred the closer one examines them. Effectively, the official opposition is presented to the public as the peaceful, non-violent, color revolution which wants Syria to become a friend of the West and Israel, as is prepared to march and tweet until they get their demands. NATO has ruled out military involvement in Syria, which unlike Libya would be a quagmire for them. Thus while overtly supporting the striped banner of the formal opposition (which itself does have an armed wing), the West is also covertly supporting the Salafist/Wahhabi/al-Qaeda terrorist opposition from which the Sufyani will emerge, because they are the ones who can do the West’s dirty work without Western leaders like Obama getting their hands dirty. Perhaps the Sufyani’s “true colors” are revealed in the riwayat from Bihar al Anwar which says that the Sufyani himself is colored red, blond, and blue. Thus this Frankstein’s monster is an American creation of the red, white, and blue, but in the mean time will wreak havoc throughout the Middle East in an attempt to prove its Salafist credentials. Another riwayat indicates that after the Mahdi eventually defeats the Sufyani, the Sufyani will flee and take refuge in the West/Europe, and this will be the basis for the Mahdi’s anger towards the West, a demand that the Sufyani be returned to Islamic land to face justice for his fitna.

The pro-Western banner and the Sufyani banner are thus intertwined, but this month the latter will prevail. The banner of righteousness will be the third banner, the yellow banner of Hezbollah, who will defend the interests of the Ahlul Bayt (as) and their Shi’ah. Sayyid Hassan Nasrullah has been discussed as the figure of the Yamani, presented in the riwayat as being the banner of righteousness, because while Lebanese, he is of Yemeni descent. Hezbollah’s participation in the Syrian conflict is inevitable. The month of May 2012 has already witnessed a spillover of Syrian violence into Lebanon.  The capital of Lebanon, Beirut, itself has just in the past week seen gunfights and killing as a result of clashes between pro-Assad and anti-Assad elements. Interestingly enough, these first clashes have been between pro-Assad Sunnis and anti-Assad Sunnis, with Hezbollah itself not yet taking a direct role. This is salient because riwayat concerning the Sufyani indicate that even though he will take power in Rajab, the Shi’ah will mostly be spared his blood-letting for a month or two – he will be focusing his wrath on more immediate enemies. This is not dissimilar to the approach taken by Salafis  in Iraq and elsewhere, assassinating Sunnis who they accuse of collaborating with their claimed enemy, be it the Shi’ah or the West – the takfirist ideology allows for the Salafis to go to great lengths to declare practically everyone else in the Muslim Ummah as a heretic. This devilish self-righteousness was prophesied by Muhammad (sawaws), when he said that a fitna would emerge from Najd, modern-day Riyadh, which would see youths pretending to be more righteous in their beliefs and deed than their fellow Muslims, killing other Muslims and leaving the disbelievers alone. While the Shi’ah will be let off the hook for a month or two, in the end their blood will be spilt the most, with riwayat indicating that anyone named Hassan or Hussein will be martyred simply for being Shi’ah. This genocide will take place with the tacit approval of a Salafist-tinged “New Middle East”.

A word needs to be said regarding the Muslim Brotherhood. In its original formulation, while majority Sunni, the Muslim Brotherhood, or Ikhawan al-Muslimin, supported unity between Sunni and Shi’ah. Its founder, Hassan al Banna, had positive views regarding the Shi’ah community, called for unity among various Muslim madhahib (doctrinal schools), and invited Shi’ah from Iran and elsewhere to participate in the Brotherhood, which they gladly did. The Muslim Brotherhood in turn played a role as one of the influences upon Ayatollah Khomeini, through Nawab Safawi, and upon the Islamic Revolution in Iran. Sayyid Qutb, another prominent Muslim Brother, was translated by IRI Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei into Farsi. HAMAS was created in Palestine by Muslim Brothers, and has had an amicable relationship with Iran up until now. Nonetheless, despite pro-Iran, pro-Shi’ah, and pro-Islamic Unity elements within the Muslim Brotherhood, the Brotherhood today has Salafi and anti-Shi’ah elements as well. Turning back to the incidents of Hama, Syria, in 1982 - the memory of tens of thousands of Muslim Brothers being killed by the Assad family has not been erased.  Present-day events remind the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and elsewhere of the massacre of  1982, and passions have been ignited for revenge.  With the fall of Husni Mubarak, the Muslim Brotherhood has taken a prominent place in Egyptian politics. In recent parliamentary elections, the Muslim Brotherhood have taken approximately 50% of the seats, and overtly Salafi candidates have taken another 25%. This Salafist Bloc will force the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood closer to more explicitly anti-Shi’ah positions. Today’s presidential elections in Egypt may also have the result of creating an atmosphere conducive to MB-Salafi influence. Conspiracy theories have abounded regarding the origins and role of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafiyya, and while pro-Zionist mainstream media CNN and Fox News commentators like Glenn Beck maintain that Obama is a secret Muslim Brother seeking the destruction of America, a more likely conspiracy is that Freemasons, MI5, MI6, and the CIA have all played their role in shaping the Muslim Brotherhood, from the Western plot against Nasserism through to the present Arab Spring. A Muslim Brotherhood and Salafi coalition ruling Egypt may create an atmosphere conducive to anti-Shi’ah sentiment, and at the very least create a complicit silence of tacit support once the Sufyani targets the Shi’ah. A taste of things to come: when HAMAS leader Ismail Haniyeh first broke with Assad and announced his support for the opposition in Syria at a Muslim Brotherhood rally in Cairo, members of the crowd shouted “ No Iran, No Hezbollah. Syria is Islamic.” The Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood, which has also been considered moderate, has called for jihadi fighters to flock to Syria to fight the Assad government as well.

The Ahlul Bayt (as) have forewarned their Shi’ah about these events to take place this month of Rajab. They have counseled us not to take sides in the conflict until the emergence of the Sufyani. A nuanced approach is necessary, and a multifaceted analysis requires that we not jump to take sides until it is clear who we are dealing with, who our friends are, and who are enemy is. After all, while Bashar al-Assad is Alawi Shi’a, his political party the Ba’ath Party (the same party which brought Saddam Hussein to power) was founded by Michel Aoun, a secularist Orthodox Christian (some say secret Jew). Rushing to wholeheartedly back al-Assad would be a mistake, as would outright condemning him. The opposition also has some legitimate grievances, but the rising frequency of al-Qaeda style suicide/homicide bombings targeting civilian centers in Damascus and elsewhere in Syria indicates that the opposition will soon be dominated by al-Qaeda. Very soon the Shi’ah of the region will be dragged into the conflict in Syria. The latest news that Lebanese Shi’ah have been kidnapped by Syrian rebels may be the opening salvo in the Sufyani’s war, and foreshadows the inevitable: Shi’ah will be targeted by Salafis in a sectarian conlict regardless of their stance. The Pure Imams (as) have told their Shi’ah that once the Sufyani emerges in Rajab, the Shi’ah should go to the aid of the Ahlul Bayt (as). Shi’ah worldwide, especially from Lebanon and Iran, will come to the aid of the Shi’ah of Syria, once the Sufyani declares his war on the Family of the Prophet (sawaws).  The Aimmah (as) have warned the Shi’ah of the region that once the Sufyani begins targeting them, the only place of safety will Mecca, to which they should make hijra, and where in Muharram they will meet their Imam Mahdi al Hujjat al Qa’im bil Haqq min Al-e Muhammad (atfs).

To be continued very soon insha’Allah, with more extensive documentation of riwayat concerning Rajab – Sufyani, heavy rains, the resurrection of the dead, earthquakes – and analysis of their trustworthiness

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Salafi Crescent: The Threat of Wahhabi Revival, The End Times Prophecy of the Sufyani, and the 2012 Countdown to the Return of Imam Mahdi al Hujjah min Al-e Muhammad (sawaws)


Salafi Crescent: The Threat of Wahhabi Revival, The End Times Prophecy of the Sufyani, and the 2012 Countdown to the Return of Imam Mahdi al Hujjah min Al-e Muhammad (sawaws)

Kenneth Kamran Toloui

Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords: Salafi, Wahhabi, Al-Qaeda, Nasibi, Sufyani, Dajjal, Anti-Christ, Arab Spring, Islamic Awakening, Shia Crescent, Shia Revival, Yamani, Mahdi, Mayan Calendar, 2012, 1433/1434



The confluence of  recent political events across the greater Middle East and North Africa, along with an Anglo-American/Zionist hegemonic policy of “divide and conquer” making for strange bedfellows, have given rise to a nascent Salafi Crescent[1], embodied and  prophesied in the figure of the Sufyani, foretold in Shi’a and Sunni prophetic traditions alike. The dream of the “Arab Spring”, or “Islamic Awakening”, which began in Tunisia in late 2010, resulted in revolutions in Egypt, Libya, and Yemen in 2011, and has manifested in various forms throughout the Arab and Islamic world, even reaching Europe and North America, will in 2012 give rise to a nightmare of apocalyptic proportions, an unprecedented bloodbath along sectarian lines resulting from the power vacuums it has produced. Israeli and Western pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran, the last true holdout to unipolar global dominance, has resulted in a cynical policy of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”, with Shi’a once again playing the bogeyman in mainstream media discourse, and unholy alliances being formed by European (post)colonial powers with al-Qaeda and its Wahhabi/Salafi allies throughout the world. This marriage of convenience will beget a demon spawn, a mass murderer to whom Abu Musab al Zarqawi of Al Qaeda in Iraq will pale in comparison. The riwayat, or prophetic traditions, that have been passed down by the Ahlul Bayt (as), the Pure Family of the Prophet Muhammad (sawaws), give us a glimpse of the doomsday scenario horrors that lie ahead, and we can in effect from them produce a timeline or countdown for 2012, one which coincides with the end date of the Mayan Calendar.

The Sufyani in both Shi’a and Sunni hadith is a dictator who will emerge in Sham, modern-day Syria. After emerging victorious in a three-sided civil war, the Sufyani will target the Shi’a of the region, with genocidal consequences. The scene has already been set: the Western powers have called for regime change in Syria, and a global jihad against the Assad government has been announced, with arms and fighters pouring in from throughout the world. Once the government of Bashar al-Assad has fallen, these takfiri jihadis will set their sights on the Shi’a of the region, be they Alawite (Alawi), Twelver (Ithna ‘Ashari), or Fiver (Zaidi/Houthi). This worldwide attack on Syria, with the Zionist entity playing a prominent role behind the scenes, will create two “revolutionary” anti-Assad factions, one explicitly pro-Western and pro-Israel, and one nominally Muslim, but dominated by the cultish sect of Salafism/Wahhabism/al Qaeda, who will do much of the dirty work for their Western puppet-masters. In time, this Frankenstein’s monster gone amuck, the Salafi faction of the Syrian civil war, will produce the Sufyani, who will attack a third faction, the defenders or remnants of the current Assad government, and possibly their Shi’a allies from Lebanon’s Hezbollah.

Unlike the nonviolent model of revolution in Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen, which notably targeted Western-backed puppet dictators (and effectively toppled the Western or American Bloc, if a comparison is to be made  between the Arab Spring and the 1968 Prague Spring, and the later post-Communist collapse of the Eastern or Soviet Bloc), the Syrian “revolution” has been explicitly armed and violent (the level of pacifism of Gene Sharp and George Soros inspired and/or funded movements seems to correspond to the needs of the elite attempting to sway and steer the masses, though at least initially in Tunisia and Egypt the popular uprisings appears to have been spontaneous). In this respect the Syrian situation has more closely resembled the Libyan civil war and revolution, which ultimately resulted in Western NATO (and Qatari) military intervention. But unlike Libya, direct Western military involvement  in Syria seems less likely, for a number of reasons. Syria has some support  from Russia and China, both permanent veto-wielding members of the United Nations Security Council. There is burnout from the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Central Africa… Barack Obama’s endless military adventurism and interventionism. Adding to that list a protracted and convoluted Syrian war will not help United States President Obama to get the support of anti-militarist elements of his own Democratic Party or isolationists from the swing vote in the upcoming US presidential elections in November. The headache of clan warfare resulting from NATO bombing in Libya is nothing compared to the predictable disaster that will result from the Balkanization of multi-denominational, multi-faith, and multi-ethnic Syria, which consists of a majority of Sunni Arabs, and a roughly 12% minority of Allawite Shi’a holding control through the Assad family and his Ba’ath Party allies, as well as significantly large minorities of (mostly Sunni) Kurds, Turkmens, and Cicassians, (mostly Christian) Armenians and Assyrians, (Sevener Shi’a) Ismailis, and Druze. The West itself is ambivalent about the nature of the Syrian “resistance”, and aware of the potential dangers of a power vacuum resulting from the removal of Assad, to whom in their eyes could apply the proverb, “Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t”. Representative of this Western ambivalence are the words of United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who claimed the US would not arm the Syrian opposition because that would entail arming elements whose loyalties are unclear, and since Al-Qaeda and HAMAS support the  Syrian opposition. "Are we supporting Al-Qaeda in Syria?” she asked rhetorically.[2] But a deeper analysis will reveal that the answer is not a simple negative, but that in fact the US and Britain have supported and have had an on-and-off relationship with Al-Qaeda and its predecessor, the Wahhabi movement, from their beginnings through to the present.

The Al-Qaeda network origins lay in the jihad which brought foreign fighters to the struggle against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, but more specifically that network was  formalized, funded, and trained by the CIA (the word “al Qaeda” being Arabic for “the base”, referring to the database of Western intelligence operatives and assets in the area). The Western/Al-Qaeda alliance ostensibly received a setback in the attacks of September 11th, 2001, but in reality America has had close ties with al Qaeda from its inception through to the present, and in fact the Wahhabi philosophy on which it is based has been supported by the British Empire since the time of its founder, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahab. Wahhabis were backed by the likes of Lawrence of Arabia as a means of weakening the Ottoman Empire and the last vestiges of the (Sunni) Caliphate, later by British and American oil corporations who created a new state, “Saudi Arabia”, a neologism named after the family with whom they traded oil, and to the present day by MI6 as a part of the “Great Game” being played out by the United Kingdom’s spies in Central Asia and beyond. Asking the question “cui bono” with regard to the World Trade Center attacks and other purported or actual Al-Qaeda activities often yields the response: the powers that be, namely the Anglo-American elite and their Zionist partners. False flag operations are part and parcel of Mossad’s daily operations, whose motto is after all: “By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt do War”. An example: the first and only “Al-Qaeda” cell found in Palestine turned out to be composed of Israelis. This is consistent with a pattern of Al-Qaeda activity beneficial to the Zionists. While Al-Qaeda has always paid lip service to the liberation of al-Quds (Jerusalem) and the Palestinian cause, in practice they have never struck Israeli targets. In Palestine, the activities of Salafi militants seemed to consist mainly of fighting with HAMAS, and kidnapping and killing Westerner supporters of the Palestinian people. While occasionally on-the-ground opposition to American imperialist wars, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq, has been carried out by local elements who have acted either under the banner of Al-Qaeda or in a manner loosely affiliated with it, the majority of the activities of “Al-Qaeda” has been campaigns of bombings of mosques, markets, schools and other soft targets via homicide or suicide bomber (though the latter is sometimes in fact an unwilling or unknowing participant on whom an explosive device is planted), killing and maiming innocent civilians, often Shi’a or non-Wahhabi Sunnis, with a huge Muslim death toll resulting. This is consistent with a hadith of the Prophet Muhammad (sawaws), as recorded in Sahih Bukhari 9:527 and 8:184, regarding a satanic sect which shall emerge from the capital of modern-day Saudi Arabia, who “will kill the Muslims and leave the idolators”.

With remarkable detail, the Wahhabi menace was foreseen by the Prophet Muhammad (sawaws) 14 centuries ago. There are several hadith from Ahlus Sunnah in which the Prophet warns that in the future out of the region of the Najd, there will emerge shayatin (devils), who will have the outward piety of Muslims, engaging in the riyaa’ of excessive ostentatious praying and fasting, but who are in fact Munafiqun (hypocrites), who “will go out of the religion [of Islam] as an arrow darts through the game’s body” (Sahih Bukhari, Book 84, Hadith 67). The region of the Najd is the location of present-day Riyadh, the birth-place of the Wahhabi movement, and its center up until today. The present day Saudi government remains a puppet of the British and Americans, with King Abdullah preferring to collude with the Israelis rather see the Iranians support resistance against his and other regional dictatorships. His status as lackey of the American imperialists allows his government to remain seemingly impervious to criticism and the Islamic Awakening happening all around him. In fact with the backing of the US, Saudi Arabia sent 2000 troops to Bahrain to kill Shi’a and burn mosques (along with the copies of the Qur’an in them), and fire on hospitals and elementary schools. This a repeat of its 2009-2010 war, with the aid of US airstrikes, on the Shi’a of Northern Yemen, who are mostly ethnic Houthis and members of the Fiver (Zaidi) school of Shi’ism, though some appear to have become Ithna ‘Asheri. Within the Saudi kingdom itself, demonstrations and calls for an Islamic Awakening in predominantly Shi’a centers like Qatif have been murderously repressed, with American and British blessing. Wahhabism, the official state sect of Saudi Arabia, underlies its neo-colonial foreign policy, as well its domestic policy toward the Shi’a, whom Allah (swt) has not coincidentally placed in the oil-rich Eastern Province of Ash-Sharqiyah. Wahhabism is also the ideology of Al-Qaeda, which while it has on occasion criticized the current Saudi regime, in particular for allowing the presence of American military bases, has nonetheless had unofficial backing and funding from the Saudi elite up to the level of its king. The Bin Laden family, for example, have built much of Saudi Arabia, and have close personal and business ties with the family of US Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush.


To be continued insha’Allah


Bibliography


Adams, Ali (2009) Quran and 2012: Secret of the Primes. London: http://www.heliwave.com
Al- Hawali, Safar bin Abdul-Rahman (2000) The Day of Wrath: Is the Intifadha of Rajab only the Beginning?
Al-Qarashi, Baqir Sharif (2007) The Life of Imam Al-Mahdi. Translated from the Persian into English by Athar Husain S.H. Razvi. Qum: Ansariyan Publications.
Amini, Ayatollah Ibrahim (1997) Al-Imam Al-Mahdi: The Just Leader of Humanity. Translated from the Persian into English by Dr. Abdulaziz Sachedina.  Qum: Ansariyan Publications.
Argüelles, José (2002) Time and the Technosphere: The Law of Time in Human Affairs. Rochester: Bear & Company.
Book of Amos, Torah.
Book of Isaiah, Torah.
Book of Revelation, Gospel.
Coomaraswamy, Ananda K. (2004) “The Early Iconography of Sagittarius”, unpublished essay, posthumously anthologized in Ananda K. Coomaraswamy (2004) Guardians of the Sundoor: Late Iconographic Essays (Quinta Essentia series). Louisville: Fons Vitae.
Cross, Stephen (2010) “Coomaraswamy, St. Augustine, and the Perennial Philosophy” in Harry Oldmeadow (2010) Crossing Religious Frontiers: Studies in Comparative Religion, Bloomington: World Wisdom, pp.73-75.
De Santillana, Giorgio and von Dechen, Hertha (1969) Hamlet's Mill: An Essay Investigating the Origins of Human Knowledge And Its Transmission Through Myth. (1977) First paperback edition Jaffrey, New Hampshire: David R. Godine
Hartner, Willy (1938) "The Pseudoplanetary Nodes of the Moon's Orbit in Hindu and Islamic Iconographies," Ars Islamica, 5(1). Reprinted in Willy Hartner (1968) Oriens-Occidens, pp. 349-404.
Jenkins, John Major (1998) Maya Cosmogenesis 2012: The True Meaning of the Maya Calendar End-Date. Santa Fe: Bear & Company.
Kurani, Ali (1984) ‘Asr-e Zuhur, Tehran : Markaz-e Nashr-e Sazman-e Tablighat-e Islami. (2004) Translated from the Persian into Bahasa Indonesia by Muhammad Amin Beig as Imam Mahdi: Dari Proses Gerakan Hingga Era Kebangkitan. Jakarta: Misbah.
Majlisi, Muhammad Baqir (1698) Bihar al-Anwar. Volumes 51-53
Nasr, Vali (2009) Fateful Crescent, later renamed Forces of Fortune: The Rise of the New Muslim Middle Class and What It Will Mean for Our World. New York: Free Press.
Nasr, Vali (2006) The Shia Revival: How Conflicts within Islam Will Shape the Future. New York: W. W. Norton.
Sahih Bukhari


[1] King Abdullah II of Jordan in December 2004 referred to the geographical swathe in the Middle East with a Shi’a majority, plurality, and/or central government as a “Shi’a Crescent”, which he claimed was a threat to the region due to the new balance of power between Sunni and Shi’a communities brought about by the 2003 US invasion of Iraq and subsequent overthrow of Saddam Hussein. My title is a play on that phrase, but whereas the “Shi’a Crescent” proved to be a sectarian ploy for (increased) US backing of Sunni Arab dictatorships, I maintain that the Salafi Crescent is a very real and emerging threat to worldwide peace, one endangering the lives of all, Sunni and Shi’a, Muslim and Non-Muslim. See Ehsan Ahrari, “The Real Challenge From the ‘Shia Crescent’”, 25 July 2006, viewed on 14 March 2012, http://www.antiwar.com/orig/ahrari.php?articleid=9398 .See also Vali Nasr 2006, The Shia Revival, New York: W.W. Norton, and 2009, Fateful Crescent, later renamed Forces of Fortune, New York: Free Press, for a Council of Foreign Relations endorsed agenda of secularizing the Middle East through the banal commodification of capital.

 


[2] Ali Rizk, “Possible Disassociation from Syria”, viewed 14 March 2012 on Hezbollah website, http://www.english.moqawama.org/essaydetails.php?eid=16767&cid=269